1356 vs Lie Down With Lions: Which Should You Read?

Cover of 1356 1356 Bernard Cornwell · 2012 ★★★★☆ 4.0 432 pages · ≈ 8 h 00 m · Moderate
More

The rascally Thomas of Hookton, aka Le Batard, and his band of not-so-merry mercenaries are bidden by the Earl of Northhampton to unearth the lost sword of Saint Peter in this recreation of the Battle of the Poitiers in…

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of Lie Down With Lions Lie Down With Lions Ken Follett · 1985 ★★★★☆ 3.9 372 pages · ≈ 6 h 53 m · Moderate
“would leave the girl's place alone in the Renault-but not always. Sometimes he took her out to dinner.”
More

Ellis, the American. Jean-Pierre, the Frenchman. They were two men on opposite sides of the cold war, with a woman torn between them. Together, they formed a triangle of passion and deception, racing from terrorist…

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

1356Lie Down With LionsEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

Scores by source

1356Lie Down With Lions
Goodreads — 3.9 (24839)
Hardcover 3.9 (29) 4.0 (1)
Google Books 5.0 (1) 3.0 (1)
Apple Books 4.0 (549) 4.0 (348)
Check price →Check price →

Reception

1356Lie Down With Lions
Ratings 549 24839
Editions 16 44
Citations — 2
Film adaptations 1 1
Want to read — 7583
Reading it now — 2195
Written reviews — 1007
Wikipedia attention 854 561
Pages 432 372
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: 1356 or Lie Down With Lions?

1356 has the higher combined reader rating across sources (1356 4.0/5, Lie Down With Lions 3.9/5).

Which is shorter to read: 1356 or Lie Down With Lions?

Lie Down With Lions is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: Lie Down With Lions (372 pages, ≈ 6 h 53 m); 1356 (432 pages, ≈ 8 h 00 m).

Which is harder to read: 1356 or Lie Down With Lions?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — 1356: Moderate; Lie Down With Lions: Moderate.

Shared themes