After London vs The Alchemy of Stone: Which Should You Read?

Cover of After London After London Richard Jefferies · 1885 ★★★☆☆ 3.1 198 pages · ≈ 3 h 40 m · Challenging
More

pages ; cm

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of The Alchemy of Stone The Alchemy of Stone Ekaterina Sedia · 2008 ★★★★☆ 3.7 324 pages · ≈ 6 h 00 m · Moderate
More

Mattie, an intelligent automaton skilled in the use of alchemy, finds herself caught in the middle of a conflict between gargoyles, the Mechanics, and the Alchemists. With the old order quickly giving way to the new,…

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

After LondonThe Alchemy of StoneEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

How to choose

Scores by source

After LondonThe Alchemy of Stone
Goodreads 3.1 (917) —
Hardcover 3.2 (9) 3.7 (17)
Check price →Check price →

Reception

After LondonThe Alchemy of Stone
Ratings 917 17
Editions 280 2
Film adaptations 1 1
Want to read 2285 —
Reading it now 181 —
Written reviews 158 —
Wikipedia attention 628 142
Pages 198 324
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: After London or The Alchemy of Stone?

The Alchemy of Stone has the higher combined reader rating across sources (The Alchemy of Stone 3.7/5, After London 3.1/5).

Which is shorter to read: After London or The Alchemy of Stone?

After London is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: After London (198 pages, ≈ 3 h 40 m); The Alchemy of Stone (324 pages, ≈ 6 h 00 m).

Which is harder to read: After London or The Alchemy of Stone?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — After London: Challenging; The Alchemy of Stone: Moderate.

Shared themes