Anguished English vs You have a point there: Which Should You Read?

Cover of Anguished English Anguished English Richard Lederer · 1987 ★★★★☆ 3.8 192 pages · ≈ 3 h 33 m · Moderate
“One of the fringe benefits of being an English or history teacher is receiving the occasional jewel of a student blooper in an essay or test paper.”
More

For years wordsmith and punster Richard Lederer has charmed and delighted fans with his bestselling "Anguished English" series. In his funniest book yet, readers will again cherish the author's latest chronicle of the…

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of You have a point there You have a point there Eric Partridge · 1953 ★★★★☆ 4.0 230 pages · ≈ 4 h 16 m · Challenging
More

This standard work on punctuation has long been judged the foremost study of the subject. It reveals punctuation to be both an indispensable craft and an invaluable art - a friend, not an enemy.

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

Anguished EnglishYou have a point thereEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

How to choose

Scores by source

Anguished EnglishYou have a point there
Goodreads — 4.2 (22)
Hardcover 4.4 (5) —
Google Books 3.0 (1) —
Check price →Check price →

Reception

Anguished EnglishYou have a point there
Ratings 5 22
Editions 11 14
Want to read — 99
Reading it now — 2
Written reviews — 3
Pages 192 230
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: Anguished English or You have a point there?

You have a point there has the higher combined reader rating across sources (You have a point there 4.0/5, Anguished English 3.8/5).

Which is shorter to read: Anguished English or You have a point there?

Anguished English is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: Anguished English (192 pages, ≈ 3 h 33 m); You have a point there (230 pages, ≈ 4 h 16 m).

Which is harder to read: Anguished English or You have a point there?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Anguished English: Moderate; You have a point there: Challenging.

Shared themes