Bad Blood vs Vampire trouble: Which Should You Read?

Cover of Bad Blood Bad Blood James Goss · 2010 ★★★★☆ 3.7 256 pages · ≈ 4 h 44 m · Moderate
More

The first in a brand new list of tie-in novels for the hit BBC series Being HumanOne of Annie's oldest friends has come looking for her – and what's more amazing is that she's found her. Denise is the ultimate party…

vs
Cover of Vampire trouble Vampire trouble Sara Humphreys · 2014 ★★★★☆ 3.8 310 pages · ≈ 5 h 44 m · Moderate
More

Book 2 of Dead in the City"Sara Humphreys has taken the vampire mythology and truly made it her own." —Romancing the Dark SideA fledgling vampire ignites a war...Maya remembers the last moments of her life as a human…

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

Bad BloodVampire troubleEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Scores by source

Bad BloodVampire trouble
Goodreads 3.7 (2587) —
Hardcover 3.0 (2) —
Google Books 4.5 (3) —

Reception

Bad BloodVampire trouble
Ratings 2587 1
Editions 4 4
Film adaptations 1 —
Wikipedia attention 226 —
Pages 256 310

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: Bad Blood or Vampire trouble?

Vampire trouble has the higher combined reader rating across sources (Vampire trouble 3.8/5, Bad Blood 3.7/5).

Which is shorter to read: Bad Blood or Vampire trouble?

Bad Blood is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: Bad Blood (256 pages, ≈ 4 h 44 m); Vampire trouble (310 pages, ≈ 5 h 44 m).

Which is harder to read: Bad Blood or Vampire trouble?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Bad Blood: Moderate; Vampire trouble: Moderate.

Shared themes