Bad Blood vs Post-mortem: Which Should You Read?

Cover of Bad Blood Bad Blood Levine, Richard M. · 1982 ★★★★☆ 3.7 343 pages · ≈ 6 h 21 m · Moderate
More

Details the shocking murders--in Terra Linda, California--of Jim and Naomi Olive by their sixteen-year-old daughter, Marlene, and her nineteen-year-old boyfriend, small-time drug dealer Chuck Riley

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of Post-mortem Post-mortem Jon Wells · 2009 ★★★☆☆ 3.3 276 pages · ≈ 5 h 07 m · Moderate
More

A jogger is running near the perimeter of the African Lion Safari theme park in southern Ontario when he stumbles across a near- mummified skeleton in a field. The skeletal remains are studied at the Hamilton morgue by…

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

Bad BloodPost-mortemEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

How to choose

Scores by source

Bad BloodPost-mortem
Goodreads 3.7 (2587) 3.3 (1920)
Hardcover 5.0 (1) —
Google Books 4.5 (3) —
Apple Books — 4.0 (14)

Reception

Bad BloodPost-mortem
Ratings 2587 1920
Editions 7 6
Film adaptations 1 1
Want to read 981 182
Reading it now 162 75
Written reviews 103 16
Wikipedia attention 226 17655
Pages 343 276

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: Bad Blood or Post-mortem?

Bad Blood has the higher combined reader rating across sources (Bad Blood 3.7/5, Post-mortem 3.3/5).

Which is shorter to read: Bad Blood or Post-mortem?

Post-mortem is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: Post-mortem (276 pages, ≈ 5 h 07 m); Bad Blood (343 pages, ≈ 6 h 21 m).

Which is harder to read: Bad Blood or Post-mortem?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Bad Blood: Moderate; Post-mortem: Moderate.

Shared themes