Basic Mathematics for Economists vs Flying Blind: Which Should You Read?

Cover of Basic Mathematics for Economists Basic Mathematics for Economists Mike Rosser · 2003 ★★★★☆ 3.8 514 pages · ≈ 9 h 31 m · Moderate
More

Economics students will welcome the new edition of this excellent textbook. Mathematics is an integral part of economics and understanding basic concepts is vital. Given that many students come into economics courses…

vs
Cover of Flying Blind Flying Blind Peter Robison · 2021 ★★★★☆ 4.2 333 pages · ≈ 6 h 10 m · Moderate
More

A fast-paced look at the corporate dysfunction--the ruthless cost-cutting, toxic workplaces, and cutthroat management--that contributed to one of the worst tragedies in modern aviation Boeing is a century-old titan of…

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

Basic Mathematics for EconomistsFlying BlindEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

How to choose

Scores by source

Basic Mathematics for EconomistsFlying Blind
Goodreads 3.9 (19) 4.2 (4453)
Hardcover — 4.3 (17)
Apple Books — 4.5 (80)

Reception

Basic Mathematics for EconomistsFlying Blind
Ratings 19 4453
Editions 13 5
Citations 14 —
Want to read — 6086
Reading it now — 610
Written reviews — 474
Wikipedia attention — 37
Pages 514 333

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: Basic Mathematics for Economists or Flying Blind?

Flying Blind has the higher combined reader rating across sources (Flying Blind 4.2/5, Basic Mathematics for Economists 3.8/5).

Which is shorter to read: Basic Mathematics for Economists or Flying Blind?

Flying Blind is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: Flying Blind (333 pages, ≈ 6 h 10 m); Basic Mathematics for Economists (514 pages, ≈ 9 h 31 m).

Which is harder to read: Basic Mathematics for Economists or Flying Blind?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Basic Mathematics for Economists: Moderate; Flying Blind: Moderate.

Shared themes