Bloodsucking Fiends vs Spellsinger: Which Should You Read?
Both live on shelves: Fiction
Bloodsucking Fiends
“Sundown painted purple across the great Pyramid while the Emperor enjoyed a steaming whiz against a dumpster in the alley below.”
More
At last, a love story you can really sink your teeth into! With a psychedelic inventiveness that invites comparison with Kurt Vonnegut and Tom Robbins, Christopher Moore, the author of Coyote Blue, spins a hip tale of…
Spellsinger
More
Spellsinger #1 “Among sentient animals and humans, hard-headed and hard-shelled wizard Clothahump searches across dimensions for a wizard to defeat looming armies of Plated Folk. Jonathan-Thomas Meriweather, part-time…
Side by side
The verdict
- Readers rate Bloodsucking Fiends highest: Bloodsucking Fiends 4.2 · Spellsinger 3.9.
- Bloodsucking Fiends has the widest readership — 217 ratings behind its score.
Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.
Scores by source
| Bloodsucking Fiends | Spellsinger | |
|---|---|---|
| Hardcover | 3.7 (143) | 3.6 (42) |
| Google Books | 4.0 (1) | 5.0 (1) |
| Apple Books | 4.5 (217) | 4.5 (30) |
| Check price → | Check price → |
Reception
| Bloodsucking Fiends | Spellsinger | |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | 217 | 42 |
| Editions | 6 | 17 |
| Film adaptations | 1 | 1 |
| Wikipedia attention | 446 | 886 |
| Pages | 304 | 348 |
| Check price → | Check price → |
Questions readers ask
Which is rated higher: Bloodsucking Fiends or Spellsinger?
Bloodsucking Fiends has the higher combined reader rating across sources (Bloodsucking Fiends 4.2/5, Spellsinger 3.9/5).
Which is shorter to read: Bloodsucking Fiends or Spellsinger?
Bloodsucking Fiends is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: Bloodsucking Fiends (304 pages, ≈ 5 h 38 m); Spellsinger (348 pages, ≈ 6 h 27 m).
Which is harder to read: Bloodsucking Fiends or Spellsinger?
Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Bloodsucking Fiends: Moderate; Spellsinger: Moderate.