Bones in London vs Robert Ludlum's The Cassandra Compact: Which Should You Read?

Both live on shelves: Thriller, Mystery, Fiction

Cover of Bones in London

Bones in London Edgar Wallace · 1900 ★★★★☆ 3.5 184 pages · ≈ 3 h 24 m · Challenging Find on Amazon

vs

Cover of Robert Ludlum's The Cassandra Compact

Robert Ludlum's The Cassandra Compact Robert Ludlum · 2001 ★★★★☆ 3.9 421 pages · ≈ 7 h 48 m · Moderate Find on Amazon

The verdict

Readers rate Robert Ludlum's The Cassandra Compact higher: 3.9 vs 3.5 from 7171 votes.
Bones in London is the quicker read — about 3 hours vs 7 for Robert Ludlum's The Cassandra Compact.
Robert Ludlum's The Cassandra Compact is the easier read (Moderate), Bones in London more demanding (Challenging).

Side by side