Catching Fire vs Fatta Eld: Which Should You Read?
Both live on shelves: Teen Fiction, Competition, Action, Juvenile works, Games, Teenage Girls
Catching Fire
“I clasp the flask between my hands even thought the warmth from the tea has long since leached into the frozen air.”
More
Against all odds, Katniss Everdeen has won the Hunger Games. She and fellow District 12 tribute Peeta Mellark are miraculously still alive. Katniss should be relieved, happy even. After all, she has returned to her…
Fatta Eld
More
En cynisk teve-värld där deltagarna tävlar med livet som insats. Detta kan vara verklighetens underhållning i framtiden...Katniss trodde att en vinst i Hungerspelen var lika med framgång, lycka och berömmelse, men…
Side by side
The verdict
- Readers rate Catching Fire highest: Catching Fire 4.5 · Fatta Eld 4.1.
- Catching Fire has the widest readership — 3953 ratings behind its score.
Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.
Scores by source
| Catching Fire | Fatta Eld | |
|---|---|---|
| Hardcover | 4.0 (1) | — |
| Apple Books | 4.5 (3953) | — |
| Check price → | Check price → |
Reception
| Catching Fire | Fatta Eld | |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | 3953 | 296 |
| Editions | 118 | 116 |
| Film adaptations | 1 | — |
| Wikipedia attention | 11874 | — |
| Pages | 395 | 400 |
| Check price → | Check price → |
Questions readers ask
Which is rated higher: Catching Fire or Fatta Eld?
Catching Fire has the higher combined reader rating across sources (Catching Fire 4.5/5, Fatta Eld 4.1/5).
Which is shorter to read: Catching Fire or Fatta Eld?
Catching Fire is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: Catching Fire (395 pages, ≈ 7 h 19 m); Fatta Eld (400 pages, ≈ 7 h 24 m).
Which is harder to read: Catching Fire or Fatta Eld?
Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Catching Fire: Light; Fatta Eld: Light.