Cranford vs Looking at the stars: Which Should You Read?

Cover of Cranford Cranford Elizabeth Cleghorn Gaskell · 1853 ★★★★☆ 3.8 Challenging
More

Cranford was first serialized in Charles Dickens’ magazine Household Words between 1851 and 1853. The structureless nature of the stories, and the fact that Gaskell was busy writing her novel Ruth at the time the…

1★2★3★4★5★
1 film adaptation
vs
Cover of Looking at the stars Looking at the stars Jo Cotterill · 2014 ★★★★☆ 4.1 374 pages · ≈ 6 h 56 m · Light
More

Amina's community is ravaged by war, and her family welcome what they hope is a liberating force. However, they face further oppression, from a regime which enforces the subordination of women, and everyone is force to…

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

CranfordLooking at the starsEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

How to choose

Scores by source

CranfordLooking at the stars
Goodreads 3.8 (49278) 4.1 (311)
Hardcover 3.8 (66) —
Apple Books 3.5 (8) —
Check price →Check price →

Reception

CranfordLooking at the stars
Ratings 49278 311
Editions 473 3
Film adaptations 1 1
Want to read 55976 —
Reading it now 2701 —
Written reviews 4102 —
Wikipedia attention 3384 —
Pages — 374
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: Cranford or Looking at the stars?

Looking at the stars has the higher combined reader rating across sources (Looking at the stars 4.1/5, Cranford 3.8/5).

Which is harder to read: Cranford or Looking at the stars?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Cranford: Challenging; Looking at the stars: Light.

Have both books been made into films?

Cranford: 1 film adaptation; Looking at the stars: no film adaptation on record.

Shared themes