Decline of Science in England vs Exploring Science: Which Should You Read?

Cover of Decline of Science in England Decline of Science in England Charles Babbage · 1830 ★★★★☆ 3.6 228 pages · ≈ 4 h 13 m · Challenging
“That the state of knowledge in any country will exert a directive influence on the general system of instruction adopted in it, is a principle too obvious to require investigation.”
More

xvi, 228 p. 22 cm

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of Exploring Science Exploring Science Mark Levesley · 2001 ★★★★☆ 3.9 390 pages · ≈ 7 h 13 m · Moderate
More

Covering all of the Sc1 to Sc4 requirements, this series incorporates the ideas and evidence statements of the revised National Curriculum. The copymaster CD Rom includes worksheets that can be adapted to meet the exact…

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

Decline of Science in EnglandExploring ScienceEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

How to choose

Scores by source

Decline of Science in EnglandExploring Science
Goodreads 3.3 (14) —
Google Books — 5.0 (1)
Check price →Check price →

Reception

Decline of Science in EnglandExploring Science
Ratings 14 1
Editions 33 42
Want to read 71 —
Reading it now 13 —
Written reviews 2 —
Pages 228 390
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: Decline of Science in England or Exploring Science?

Exploring Science has the higher combined reader rating across sources (Exploring Science 3.9/5, Decline of Science in England 3.6/5).

Which is shorter to read: Decline of Science in England or Exploring Science?

Decline of Science in England is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: Decline of Science in England (228 pages, ≈ 4 h 13 m); Exploring Science (390 pages, ≈ 7 h 13 m).

Which is harder to read: Decline of Science in England or Exploring Science?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Decline of Science in England: Challenging; Exploring Science: Moderate.

Shared themes