Edison's conquest of Mars vs Star Hunter: Which Should You Read?

Cover of Edison's conquest of Mars Edison's conquest of Mars Garrett Putman Serviss · 1947 ★★★☆☆ 2.9 119 pages · ≈ 2 h 12 m · Challenging
More

The original sequel to HG Wells War of the Worlds as written by the science editor of the Hearst newspaper group. Mentioned multiple times by rocket pioneer Robert Hutchings Goddard in his diaries as one of the sources…

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of Star Hunter Star Hunter Andre Norton · 1961 ★★★★☆ 3.9 102 pages · ≈ 1 h 53 m · Moderate
More

On the unexplored jungle world of Jumala, former pilot turned safari guide Ras Hume schemes to collect the reward for finding a missing heir to a fortune. A busboy from local dive bar is brainwashed into believing he is…

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

Edison's conquest of MarsStar HunterEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

How to choose

Scores by source

Edison's conquest of MarsStar Hunter
Goodreads 2.8 (267) —
Hardcover 2.7 (3) 2.9 (5)
Apple Books 3.5 (7) 4.0 (53)
Check price →Check price →

Reception

Edison's conquest of MarsStar Hunter
Ratings 267 53
Editions 57 61
Film adaptations 1 1
Want to read 227 —
Reading it now 38 —
Written reviews 69 —
Wikipedia attention — 400
Pages 119 102
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: Edison's conquest of Mars or Star Hunter?

Star Hunter has the higher combined reader rating across sources (Star Hunter 3.9/5, Edison's conquest of Mars 2.9/5).

Which is shorter to read: Edison's conquest of Mars or Star Hunter?

Star Hunter is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: Star Hunter (102 pages, ≈ 1 h 53 m); Edison's conquest of Mars (119 pages, ≈ 2 h 12 m).

Which is harder to read: Edison's conquest of Mars or Star Hunter?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Edison's conquest of Mars: Challenging; Star Hunter: Moderate.

Shared themes