Falling in love vs Fragments of science: Which Should You Read?

Cover of Falling in love Falling in love Grant Allen · 1889 ★★★☆☆ 3.3 203 pages · ≈ 3 h 46 m · Challenging
More

The book as modern biology teaches us to believe, is nothing more than the latest, highest, and most involved exemplification, in the human race, of that almost universal selective process. In our own species, the…

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of Fragments of science Fragments of science John Tyndall · 1879 ★★★★☆ 3.8 589 pages · ≈ 10 h 54 m · Challenging
More

For decades, John Tyndall's Fragments of Science was a fixture on the shelves of anyone who cared about the power and beauty of scientific thought. But its Victorian prose has become a barrier. This edition clears that…

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

Falling in loveFragments of scienceEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

How to choose

Scores by source

Falling in loveFragments of science
Goodreads 2.7 (29) 4.0 (6)
Hardcover 3.8 (6) —
Apple Books 3.5 (10) —
Check price →Check price →

Reception

Falling in loveFragments of science
Ratings 29 6
Editions 29 26
Citations 3 34
Film adaptations 1 —
Want to read 81 23
Reading it now 13 —
Written reviews 4 1
Wikipedia attention 2388 —
Pages 203 589
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: Falling in love or Fragments of science?

Fragments of science has the higher combined reader rating across sources (Fragments of science 3.8/5, Falling in love 3.3/5).

Which is shorter to read: Falling in love or Fragments of science?

Falling in love is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: Falling in love (203 pages, ≈ 3 h 46 m); Fragments of science (589 pages, ≈ 10 h 54 m).

Which is harder to read: Falling in love or Fragments of science?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Falling in love: Challenging; Fragments of science: Challenging.

Shared themes