Gilgamesh vs The Fall of Arthur: Which Should You Read?

Cover of Gilgamesh Gilgamesh Stephen Mitchell · 2004 ★★★★☆ 4.0 304 pages · ≈ 5 h 38 m · Moderate
More

"Gilgamesh dates from as early as 1700 BCE - a thousand years before the Iliad. Lost for almost two millennia, the eleven clay tablets on which the epic was inscribed were discovered in 1853 in the ruins of Nineveh, and…

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of The Fall of Arthur The Fall of Arthur J.R.R. Tolkien · 2013 ★★★★☆ 3.6 240 pages · ≈ 4 h 27 m · Challenging
More

The first publication of a previously unknown narrative poem by J.R.R. Tolkien, which tells the extraordinary story of the final days of England's legendary hero, King Arthur.

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

GilgameshThe Fall of ArthurEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

How to choose

Scores by source

GilgameshThe Fall of Arthur
Hardcover 4.0 (2) 3.3 (17)
Apple Books 4.0 (64) —
Check price →Check price →

Reception

GilgameshThe Fall of Arthur
Ratings 64 17
Editions 11 13
Citations — 3
Film adaptations 1 1
Wikipedia attention 47756 790
Pages 304 240
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: Gilgamesh or The Fall of Arthur?

Gilgamesh has the higher combined reader rating across sources (Gilgamesh 4.0/5, The Fall of Arthur 3.6/5).

Which is shorter to read: Gilgamesh or The Fall of Arthur?

The Fall of Arthur is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: The Fall of Arthur (240 pages, ≈ 4 h 27 m); Gilgamesh (304 pages, ≈ 5 h 38 m).

Which is harder to read: Gilgamesh or The Fall of Arthur?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Gilgamesh: Moderate; The Fall of Arthur: Challenging.

Shared themes