King Arthur in legend and history vs The History of the Kings of Britain: Which Should You Read?
Both live on shelves: Sources, Britons, Kings and rulers, Legends, Arthurian romances, Great Britain
King Arthur in legend and history
More
Presenting selections from medieval Latin, Welsh, English, French and German literature, Richard White traces the Arthurian legend from the earliest mentions of Arthur in Latin chronicles to Thomas Malory's Le Morte…
The History of the Kings of Britain
More
The History of the Kings of Britain, by Geoffrey of Manmouth, with introduction by J. A. Giles. The Historia Regum Britanniae (English: The History of the Kings of Britain) is a pseudohistorical account of British…
Side by side
The verdict
- Ratings are close across the board — any is a safe pick by score.
- The History of the Kings of Britain is the quickest read — about 7 hours vs 10 for King Arthur in legend and history.
- The History of the Kings of Britain has the widest readership — 7026 ratings behind its score.
- The History of the Kings of Britain reaches further in scholarship and criticism — cited 61 times.
Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.
How to choose
Scores by source
| King Arthur in legend and history | The History of the Kings of Britain | |
|---|---|---|
| Goodreads | 3.9 (53) | 3.7 (7026) |
| Hardcover | — | 3.4 (7) |
| Apple Books | — | 2.5 (6) |
| Check price → | Check price → |
Reception
| King Arthur in legend and history | The History of the Kings of Britain | |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | 53 | 7026 |
| Editions | 7 | 6 |
| Citations | 11 | 61 |
| Film adaptations | — | 1 |
| Want to read | 173 | 12065 |
| Reading it now | 6 | 610 |
| Written reviews | 5 | 426 |
| Wikipedia attention | — | 7703 |
| Pages | 589 | 388 |
| Check price → | Check price → |
Questions readers ask
Which is rated higher: King Arthur in legend and history or The History of the Kings of Britain?
King Arthur in legend and history has the higher combined reader rating across sources (King Arthur in legend and history 3.8/5, The History of the Kings of Britain 3.7/5).
Which is shorter to read: King Arthur in legend and history or The History of the Kings of Britain?
The History of the Kings of Britain is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: The History of the Kings of Britain (388 pages, ≈ 7 h 11 m); King Arthur in legend and history (589 pages, ≈ 10 h 54 m).
Which is harder to read: King Arthur in legend and history or The History of the Kings of Britain?
Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — King Arthur in legend and history: Challenging; The History of the Kings of Britain: Moderate.