King Arthur in legend and history vs The History of the Kings of Britain: Which Should You Read?

Cover of King Arthur in legend and history King Arthur in legend and history Richard White · 1997 ★★★★☆ 3.8 589 pages · ≈ 10 h 54 m · Challenging
More

Presenting selections from medieval Latin, Welsh, English, French and German literature, Richard White traces the Arthurian legend from the earliest mentions of Arthur in Latin chronicles to Thomas Malory's Le Morte…

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of The History of the Kings of Britain The History of the Kings of Britain Geoffrey of Monmouth · 1973 ★★★★☆ 3.7 388 pages · ≈ 7 h 11 m · Moderate
More

The History of the Kings of Britain, by Geoffrey of Manmouth, with introduction by J. A. Giles. The Historia Regum Britanniae (English: The History of the Kings of Britain) is a pseudohistorical account of British…

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

King Arthur in legend and historyThe History of the Kings of BritainEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

How to choose

Scores by source

King Arthur in legend and historyThe History of the Kings of Britain
Goodreads 3.9 (53) 3.7 (7026)
Hardcover — 3.4 (7)
Apple Books — 2.5 (6)
Check price →Check price →

Reception

King Arthur in legend and historyThe History of the Kings of Britain
Ratings 53 7026
Editions 7 6
Citations 11 61
Film adaptations — 1
Want to read 173 12065
Reading it now 6 610
Written reviews 5 426
Wikipedia attention — 7703
Pages 589 388
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: King Arthur in legend and history or The History of the Kings of Britain?

King Arthur in legend and history has the higher combined reader rating across sources (King Arthur in legend and history 3.8/5, The History of the Kings of Britain 3.7/5).

Which is shorter to read: King Arthur in legend and history or The History of the Kings of Britain?

The History of the Kings of Britain is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: The History of the Kings of Britain (388 pages, ≈ 7 h 11 m); King Arthur in legend and history (589 pages, ≈ 10 h 54 m).

Which is harder to read: King Arthur in legend and history or The History of the Kings of Britain?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — King Arthur in legend and history: Challenging; The History of the Kings of Britain: Moderate.

Shared themes