London vs St. George and St. Michael: Which Should You Read?

Cover of London London Edward Rutherfurd · 1997 ★★★★☆ 4.0 829 pages · ≈ 15 h 21 m · Moderate
“Many times since the Earth was young, the place had lain under the sea.”
More

| image =

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of St. George and St. Michael St. George and St. Michael George MacDonald · 1876 ★★★★☆ 4.1 450 pages · ≈ 8 h 20 m · Challenging
More

It was the middle of autumn, and had rained all day. Through the lozenge-panes of the wide oriel window the world appeared in the slowly gathering dusk not a little dismal. The drops that clung trickling to the dim…

Side by side

LondonSt. George and St. MichaelEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

How to choose

Scores by source

LondonSt. George and St. Michael
Goodreads — 4.2 (72)
Hardcover 3.9 (37) —
Google Books 1.0 (1) —
Apple Books 4.0 (216) 4.0 (10)

Reception

LondonSt. George and St. Michael
Ratings 216 72
Editions 11 69
Film adaptations 1 —
Want to read — 139
Reading it now — 26
Written reviews — 13
Wikipedia attention 233584 3
Pages 829 450

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: London or St. George and St. Michael?

St. George and St. Michael has the higher combined reader rating across sources (St. George and St. Michael 4.1/5, London 4.0/5).

Which is shorter to read: London or St. George and St. Michael?

St. George and St. Michael is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: St. George and St. Michael (450 pages, ≈ 8 h 20 m); London (829 pages, ≈ 15 h 21 m).

Which is harder to read: London or St. George and St. Michael?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — London: Moderate; St. George and St. Michael: Challenging.

Shared themes