Physical science vs Progress in optics: Which Should You Read?

Cover of Physical science Physical science Bill W. Tillery · 1991 ★★★★☆ 3.5 707 pages · ≈ 13 h 06 m · Moderate
More

top: diagram of the structure of the Earth including its atmosphere in Earth sciences and a diamond cuboctahedron in materials science

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of Progress in optics Progress in optics Emil Wolf · 1963 ★★★★☆ 3.8 Moderate
More

Principles of Optics is one of the most highly cited and most influential physics books ever published, and one of the classic science books of the twentieth century. To celebrate the 60th anniversary of this remarkable…

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

Physical scienceProgress in opticsEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

Scores by source

Physical scienceProgress in optics
Goodreads 3.2 (36) —
Hardcover 4.0 (1) —
Check price →Check price →

Reception

Physical scienceProgress in optics
Ratings 36 1
Editions 34 62
Film adaptations 1 1
Want to read 80 —
Reading it now 17 —
Written reviews 4 —
Wikipedia attention 40280 59
Pages 707 —
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: Physical science or Progress in optics?

Progress in optics has the higher combined reader rating across sources (Progress in optics 3.8/5, Physical science 3.5/5).

Which is harder to read: Physical science or Progress in optics?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Physical science: Moderate; Progress in optics: Moderate.

Shared themes