Sylvie and Bruno vs The Royal Book of Oz: Which Should You Read?

Cover of Sylvie and Bruno Sylvie and Bruno Lewis Carroll · 1889 ★★★★☆ 3.9 188 pages · ≈ 3 h 29 m · Moderate
“THE Warden, a tall dignified man with a grave but very pleasant face, was seated before a writing-table, which was covered with papers, and holding on his knee one of the sweetest and loveliest little maidens it has ever been my lot to see.”
More

Two little children meet adventure in such places as Dogland, Outland, and Elfland.

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of The Royal Book of Oz The Royal Book of Oz Ruth Plumly Thompson · 1921 ★★★★☆ 4.0 138 pages · ≈ 2 h 33 m · Moderate
More

Scarecrow searches for his family tree and discovers that he is the Long Lost Emperor of the Silver Island.

Side by side

Sylvie and BrunoThe Royal Book of OzEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

Scores by source

Sylvie and BrunoThe Royal Book of Oz
Goodreads — 4.0 (7150)
Hardcover 3.8 (4) 2.0 (2)
Google Books 5.0 (1) —
Apple Books 4.0 (5) —
Check price →Check price →

Reception

Sylvie and BrunoThe Royal Book of Oz
Ratings 5 7150
Editions 232 270
Citations 12 —
Film adaptations 1 1
Want to read — 6375
Written reviews — 108
Wikipedia attention 953 713
Pages 188 138
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: Sylvie and Bruno or The Royal Book of Oz?

The Royal Book of Oz has the higher combined reader rating across sources (The Royal Book of Oz 4.0/5, Sylvie and Bruno 3.9/5).

Which is shorter to read: Sylvie and Bruno or The Royal Book of Oz?

The Royal Book of Oz is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: The Royal Book of Oz (138 pages, ≈ 2 h 33 m); Sylvie and Bruno (188 pages, ≈ 3 h 29 m).

Which is harder to read: Sylvie and Bruno or The Royal Book of Oz?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Sylvie and Bruno: Moderate; The Royal Book of Oz: Moderate.

Shared themes