The Battle of Hackham Heath vs The Royal Book of Oz: Which Should You Read?

Cover of The Battle of Hackham Heath The Battle of Hackham Heath John Flanagan · 2016 ★★★★☆ 4.4 368 pages · ≈ 6 h 49 m · Light
More

As Morgarath recruits an army of Wargals, Halt ventures into enemy territory to uncover the extent of Morgarath's plan of attack.

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of The Royal Book of Oz The Royal Book of Oz Ruth Plumly Thompson · 1921 ★★★★☆ 4.0 138 pages · ≈ 2 h 33 m · Moderate
More

Scarecrow searches for his family tree and discovers that he is the Long Lost Emperor of the Silver Island.

Side by side

The Battle of Hackham HeathThe Royal Book of OzEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

How to choose

Scores by source

The Battle of Hackham HeathThe Royal Book of Oz
Goodreads 4.4 (10132) 4.0 (7150)
Hardcover 4.1 (25) 2.0 (2)
Apple Books 4.5 (287) —

Reception

The Battle of Hackham HeathThe Royal Book of Oz
Ratings 10132 7150
Editions 4 270
Film adaptations 1 1
Want to read 4995 6375
Reading it now 690 —
Written reviews 510 108
Wikipedia attention 113 713
Pages 368 138

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: The Battle of Hackham Heath or The Royal Book of Oz?

The Battle of Hackham Heath has the higher combined reader rating across sources (The Battle of Hackham Heath 4.4/5, The Royal Book of Oz 4.0/5).

Which is shorter to read: The Battle of Hackham Heath or The Royal Book of Oz?

The Royal Book of Oz is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: The Royal Book of Oz (138 pages, ≈ 2 h 33 m); The Battle of Hackham Heath (368 pages, ≈ 6 h 49 m).

Which is harder to read: The Battle of Hackham Heath or The Royal Book of Oz?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — The Battle of Hackham Heath: Light; The Royal Book of Oz: Moderate.

Shared themes