The crown of wild olives vs The Stones of Venice: Which Should You Read?
Both live on shelves: Sculpture, Architecture, Art
The crown of wild olives
Twenty years ago, there was no lovelier piece of lowland scenery in South England, nor any more pathetic in the world, by its expression of sweet human character and life, than that immediately bordering on the sources…
vs
The Stones of Venice
The Stones of Venice is a three-volume treatise on Venetian art and architecture by English art historian John Ruskin, first published from 1851 to 1853. The Stones of Venice examines Venetian architecture in detail,…
The verdict
- Readers rate The Stones of Venice highest: The Stones of Venice 3.9 · The crown of wild olives 3.6.
- The Stones of Venice has the widest readership — 756 ratings behind its score.
How to choose
Scores by source
| The crown of wild olives | The Stones of Venice | |
|---|---|---|
| Goodreads | 3.4 (32) | 3.9 (756) |
| Hardcover | — | 2.0 (1) |
Reception
| The crown of wild olives | The Stones of Venice | |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | 32 | 756 |
| Editions | 57 | 144 |
| Citations | — | 206 |
| Film adaptations | — | 1 |
| Want to read | 130 | 3624 |
| Reading it now | 2 | 141 |
| Written reviews | 3 | 59 |
| Wikipedia attention | — | 1362 |
| Pages | 250 | 236 |