The Poison Belt vs The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine: Which Should You Read?

Cover of The Poison Belt The Poison Belt Arthur Conan Doyle · 1913 ★★★★☆ 3.9 83 pages · ≈ 1 h 32 m · Challenging
More

Being an account of another adventure of Prof. George E. Challenger, Lord John Roxton, Prof. Summerlee and Mr E. D. M alone, the discoverers of "The Lost World".

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine H. G. Wells · 1946 ★★★★☆ 4.5 269 pages · ≈ 4 h 59 m · Challenging
More

A compilation of the two stories by H. G. Wells, with original acknowledgements, etc., and no additional commentary.

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

The Poison BeltThe War Of The Worlds/The Time MachineEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

How to choose

Scores by source

The Poison BeltThe War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine
Hardcover 3.1 (17) —
Apple Books 4.0 (98) 4.5 (502)
Check price →Check price →

Reception

The Poison BeltThe War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine
Ratings 98 502
Editions 345 39
Film adaptations 1 —
Wikipedia attention 770 —
Pages 83 269
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: The Poison Belt or The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine?

The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine has the higher combined reader rating across sources (The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine 4.5/5, The Poison Belt 3.9/5).

Which is shorter to read: The Poison Belt or The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine?

The Poison Belt is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: The Poison Belt (83 pages, ≈ 1 h 32 m); The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine (269 pages, ≈ 4 h 59 m).

Which is harder to read: The Poison Belt or The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — The Poison Belt: Challenging; The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine: Challenging.

Shared themes