Bones in London vs Two Little Girls in Blue: Which Should You Read?

Both live on shelves: Thriller, Mystery, Fiction

Cover of Bones in London

Bones in London Edgar Wallace · 1900 ★★★★☆ 3.5 184 pages · ≈ 3 h 24 m · Challenging Find on Amazon

vs

Cover of Two Little Girls in Blue

Two Little Girls in Blue Mary Higgins Clark · 2006 ★★★★☆ 3.9 345 pages · ≈ 6 h 23 m · Light Find on Amazon

The verdict

Readers rate Two Little Girls in Blue higher: 3.9 vs 3.5 from 35720 votes.
Bones in London is the quicker read — about 3 hours vs 6 for Two Little Girls in Blue.
Two Little Girls in Blue is the easier read (Light), Bones in London more demanding (Challenging).

Side by side