Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae vs The tragedies of Euripides: Which Should You Read?
Both live on shelves: Greek Mythology, Drama
The tragedies of Euripides
More
Ten tragedies by one of the three great tragedians of classical Athens, namely Hecuba, Orestes, The Phœnician Virgins, Medea, Hippolytus, Alcestis, The Bacchæ, The Heraclidæ, Iphigenia in Aulis, and Iphigenia in Tauris.
Side by side
The verdict
- Ratings are close across the board — any is a safe pick by score.
- Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae has the widest readership — 1620 ratings behind its score.
Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.
Scores by source
| Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae | The tragedies of Euripides | |
|---|---|---|
| Goodreads | 4.1 (1620) | 4.2 (315) |
| Check price → | Check price → |
Reception
| Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae | The tragedies of Euripides | |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | 1620 | 315 |
| Editions | 8 | 9 |
| Want to read | — | 451 |
| Reading it now | — | 95 |
| Written reviews | — | 27 |
| Pages | 375 | 372 |
| Check price → | Check price → |
Questions readers ask
Which is rated higher: Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae or The tragedies of Euripides?
The tragedies of Euripides has the higher combined reader rating across sources (The tragedies of Euripides 4.2/5, Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae 4.1/5).
Which is shorter to read: Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae or The tragedies of Euripides?
The tragedies of Euripides is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: The tragedies of Euripides (372 pages, ≈ 6 h 53 m); Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae (375 pages, ≈ 6 h 57 m).
Which is harder to read: Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae or The tragedies of Euripides?
Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae: Challenging; The tragedies of Euripides: Challenging.