Bones in London vs The Man Who Knew: Which Should You Read?

Cover of Bones in London Bones in London Edgar Wallace · 1900 ★★★★☆ 3.5 184 pages · ≈ 3 h 24 m · Challenging
More

The new Managing Director of Schemes Ltd has an elegant London office and a theatrically dressed assistant - however Bones, as he is better known, is bored. Luckily there is a slump in the shipping market and it is not…

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of The Man Who Knew The Man Who Knew Edgar Wallace · 1918 ★★★☆☆ 3.4 145 pages · ≈ 2 h 41 m · Challenging
“THE room was a small one, and had been chosen for its remoteness from the dwelling rooms.”
More

John Minute, formerly an unscrupulous African mining magnate, has flown to England, but can’t escape his past. Constantly threatened by blackmailers, he fears death and financial ruin. At the suggestion of the…

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

Bones in LondonThe Man Who KnewEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Scores by source

Bones in LondonThe Man Who Knew
Goodreads 3.4 (144) 3.4 (241)
Hardcover — 2.0 (1)
Apple Books 4.5 (7) 3.5 (19)

Reception

Bones in LondonThe Man Who Knew
Ratings 144 241
Editions 27 70
Film adaptations — 1
Want to read 151 152
Reading it now 56 26
Written reviews 17 29
Wikipedia attention — 52
Pages 184 145

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: Bones in London or The Man Who Knew?

Bones in London has the higher combined reader rating across sources (Bones in London 3.5/5, The Man Who Knew 3.4/5).

Which is shorter to read: Bones in London or The Man Who Knew?

The Man Who Knew is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: The Man Who Knew (145 pages, ≈ 2 h 41 m); Bones in London (184 pages, ≈ 3 h 24 m).

Which is harder to read: Bones in London or The Man Who Knew?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Bones in London: Challenging; The Man Who Knew: Challenging.

Shared themes