Bones in London vs The Square Emerald: Which Should You Read?

Cover of Bones in London Bones in London Edgar Wallace · 1900 ★★★★☆ 3.5 184 pages · ≈ 3 h 24 m · Challenging
More

The new Managing Director of Schemes Ltd has an elegant London office and a theatrically dressed assistant - however Bones, as he is better known, is bored. Luckily there is a slump in the shipping market and it is not…

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of The Square Emerald The Square Emerald Edgar Wallace · 1926 ★★★★☆ 3.5 188 pages · ≈ 3 h 29 m · Challenging
More

Leslie Maughan, recognized for her keen mind, has unofficially been promoted to Scotland Yard’s first female investigator. Chancing upon a book of poetry once owned by a Peter Dawlish, convicted forger, Leslie delves…

Side by side

Bones in LondonThe Square EmeraldEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Scores by source

Bones in LondonThe Square Emerald
Goodreads 3.4 (144) 3.5 (156)
Hardcover — 1.5 (1)
Apple Books 4.5 (7) 5.0 (5)

Reception

Bones in LondonThe Square Emerald
Ratings 144 156
Editions 27 34
Film adaptations — 1
Want to read 151 —
Reading it now 56 —
Written reviews 17 —
Pages 184 188

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: Bones in London or The Square Emerald?

The Square Emerald has the higher combined reader rating across sources (The Square Emerald 3.5/5, Bones in London 3.5/5).

Which is shorter to read: Bones in London or The Square Emerald?

Bones in London is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: Bones in London (184 pages, ≈ 3 h 24 m); The Square Emerald (188 pages, ≈ 3 h 29 m).

Which is harder to read: Bones in London or The Square Emerald?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Bones in London: Challenging; The Square Emerald: Challenging.

Shared themes