Decline of Science in England vs Sciences: Which Should You Read?
Both live on shelves: Science
Decline of Science in England
“That the state of knowledge in any country will exert a directive influence on the general system of instruction adopted in it, is a principle too obvious to require investigation.”
More
xvi, 228 p. 22 cm
vs
Sciences
More
In this thought-provoking follow-up to his acclaimed StarTalk book, uber astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson tackles the world's most important philosophical questions about the universe with wit, wisdom, and…
Side by side
The verdict
- Ratings are close across the board — any is a safe pick by score.
- Sciences has the widest readership — 100 ratings behind its score.
Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.
Scores by source
| Decline of Science in England | Sciences | |
|---|---|---|
| Goodreads | 3.3 (14) | 3.6 (100) |
| Check price → | Check price → |
Reception
| Decline of Science in England | Sciences | |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | 14 | 100 |
| Editions | 33 | 27 |
| Want to read | 71 | 282 |
| Reading it now | 13 | 23 |
| Written reviews | 2 | 5 |
| Wikipedia attention | — | 88190 |
| Pages | 228 | — |
| Check price → | Check price → |
Questions readers ask
Which is rated higher: Decline of Science in England or Sciences?
Decline of Science in England has the higher combined reader rating across sources (Decline of Science in England 3.6/5, Sciences 3.6/5).
Which is harder to read: Decline of Science in England or Sciences?
Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Decline of Science in England: Challenging; Sciences: Moderate.