Hering's dictionary of classical and modern cookery vs How to Eat: Which Should You Read?

Cover of Hering's dictionary of classical and modern cookery Hering's dictionary of classical and modern cookery Richard Hering · 1958 ★★★★☆ 4.0 852 pages · ≈ 15 h 47 m · Moderate
More
1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of How to Eat How to Eat Nigella Lawson · 1998 ★★★★☆ 4.2 537 pages · ≈ 9 h 57 m · Moderate
More

The New York Times–bestselling cookbook author "reveals her mastery not only of the stove but also of the essay" with these recipes and reflections (Booklist). "Food, for me, is a constant pleasure: I like to think…

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

Hering's dictionary of classical and modern cookeryHow to EatEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

How to choose

Scores by source

Hering's dictionary of classical and modern cookeryHow to Eat
Goodreads 4.4 (16) 4.2 (7412)
Hardcover — 4.0 (6)
Google Books — 1.0 (1)

Reception

Hering's dictionary of classical and modern cookeryHow to Eat
Ratings 16 7412
Editions 10 15
Want to read 85 9681
Reading it now 3 318
Written reviews — 172
Wikipedia attention — 294
Pages 852 537

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: Hering's dictionary of classical and modern cookery or How to Eat?

How to Eat has the higher combined reader rating across sources (How to Eat 4.2/5, Hering's dictionary of classical and modern cookery 4.0/5).

Which is shorter to read: Hering's dictionary of classical and modern cookery or How to Eat?

How to Eat is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: How to Eat (537 pages, ≈ 9 h 57 m); Hering's dictionary of classical and modern cookery (852 pages, ≈ 15 h 47 m).

Which is harder to read: Hering's dictionary of classical and modern cookery or How to Eat?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Hering's dictionary of classical and modern cookery: Moderate; How to Eat: Moderate.

Shared themes