King Arthur in antiquity vs Les lettres de mon moulin: Which Should You Read?

Cover of King Arthur in antiquity King Arthur in antiquity Graham Anderson · 2003 ★★★★☆ 3.7 224 pages · ≈ 4 h 09 m · Challenging
More

This original and compelling study argues against the traditional identification of Arthur as a king in Celtic Britain. Instead, Graham Anderson explores the evidence for two much older figures, known to classical…

vs
Cover of Les lettres de mon moulin Les lettres de mon moulin Alphonse Daudet · 1869 ★★★★☆ 3.7 246 pages · ≈ 4 h 33 m · Challenging
More

Célèbres histoires de Provence, pour enfants de tous les âges.

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

King Arthur in antiquityLes lettres de mon moulinEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

Scores by source

King Arthur in antiquityLes lettres de mon moulin
Goodreads 3.1 (7) 3.2 (4)
Hardcover — 3.5 (2)
Check price →Check price →

Reception

King Arthur in antiquityLes lettres de mon moulin
Ratings 7 4
Editions 9 277
Citations 5 —
Film adaptations — 1
Want to read — 5
Written reviews — 4
Pages 224 246
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: King Arthur in antiquity or Les lettres de mon moulin?

Les lettres de mon moulin has the higher combined reader rating across sources (Les lettres de mon moulin 3.7/5, King Arthur in antiquity 3.7/5).

Which is shorter to read: King Arthur in antiquity or Les lettres de mon moulin?

King Arthur in antiquity is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: King Arthur in antiquity (224 pages, ≈ 4 h 09 m); Les lettres de mon moulin (246 pages, ≈ 4 h 33 m).

Which is harder to read: King Arthur in antiquity or Les lettres de mon moulin?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — King Arthur in antiquity: Challenging; Les lettres de mon moulin: Challenging.

Shared themes