King Arthur in antiquity vs The History of the Kings of Britain: Which Should You Read?

Cover of King Arthur in antiquity King Arthur in antiquity Graham Anderson · 2003 ★★★★☆ 3.7 224 pages · ≈ 4 h 09 m · Challenging
More

This original and compelling study argues against the traditional identification of Arthur as a king in Celtic Britain. Instead, Graham Anderson explores the evidence for two much older figures, known to classical…

vs
Cover of The History of the Kings of Britain The History of the Kings of Britain Geoffrey of Monmouth · 1973 ★★★★☆ 3.7 388 pages · ≈ 7 h 11 m · Moderate
More

The History of the Kings of Britain, by Geoffrey of Manmouth, with introduction by J. A. Giles. The Historia Regum Britanniae (English: The History of the Kings of Britain) is a pseudohistorical account of British…

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

King Arthur in antiquityThe History of the Kings of BritainEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

How to choose

Scores by source

King Arthur in antiquityThe History of the Kings of Britain
Goodreads 3.1 (7) 3.7 (7026)
Hardcover — 3.4 (7)
Apple Books — 2.5 (6)
Check price →Check price →

Reception

King Arthur in antiquityThe History of the Kings of Britain
Ratings 7 7026
Editions 9 6
Citations 5 61
Film adaptations — 1
Want to read — 12065
Reading it now — 610
Written reviews — 426
Wikipedia attention — 7703
Pages 224 388
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: King Arthur in antiquity or The History of the Kings of Britain?

The History of the Kings of Britain has the higher combined reader rating across sources (The History of the Kings of Britain 3.7/5, King Arthur in antiquity 3.7/5).

Which is shorter to read: King Arthur in antiquity or The History of the Kings of Britain?

King Arthur in antiquity is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: King Arthur in antiquity (224 pages, ≈ 4 h 09 m); The History of the Kings of Britain (388 pages, ≈ 7 h 11 m).

Which is harder to read: King Arthur in antiquity or The History of the Kings of Britain?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — King Arthur in antiquity: Challenging; The History of the Kings of Britain: Moderate.

Shared themes