Mastodonia vs The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine: Which Should You Read?

Cover of Mastodonia Mastodonia Clifford D. Simak · 1978 ★★★★☆ 3.7 251 pages · ≈ 4 h 39 m · Moderate
More

Science Fiction Asa Steele was unprepared for the incredible events that began to unfold when Rila Elliot--a long-lost love--stepped out of the past and his faithful dog Bowser started loping into it through time trails…

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine H. G. Wells · 1946 ★★★★☆ 4.5 269 pages · ≈ 4 h 59 m · Challenging
More

A compilation of the two stories by H. G. Wells, with original acknowledgements, etc., and no additional commentary.

1★2★3★4★5★

Side by side

MastodoniaThe War Of The Worlds/The Time MachineEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

How to choose

Scores by source

MastodoniaThe War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine
Goodreads 3.7 (1214) —
Hardcover 3.2 (4) —
Apple Books 4.0 (51) 4.5 (502)
Check price →Check price →

Reception

MastodoniaThe War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine
Ratings 1214 502
Editions 13 39
Film adaptations 1 —
Want to read 787 —
Reading it now 367 —
Written reviews 136 —
Pages 251 269
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is rated higher: Mastodonia or The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine?

The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine has the higher combined reader rating across sources (The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine 4.5/5, Mastodonia 3.7/5).

Which is shorter to read: Mastodonia or The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine?

Mastodonia is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: Mastodonia (251 pages, ≈ 4 h 39 m); The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine (269 pages, ≈ 4 h 59 m).

Which is harder to read: Mastodonia or The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Mastodonia: Moderate; The War Of The Worlds/The Time Machine: Challenging.

Shared themes