How to Eat vs The Science of Cooking: Which Should You Read?

Cover of How to Eat How to Eat Nigella Lawson · 1998 ★★★★☆ 4.2 537 pages · ≈ 9 h 57 m · Moderate
More

The New York Times–bestselling cookbook author "reveals her mastery not only of the stove but also of the essay" with these recipes and reflections (Booklist). "Food, for me, is a constant pleasure: I like to think…

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of The Science of Cooking The Science of Cooking Joseph J. Provost · 2016 544 pages · ≈ 10 h 04 m · Moderate
More

PROVIDES A CLEAR AND ACCESSIBLE PATH TO LEARNING KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS THROUGH THE LENS OF FOOD AND COOKINGThe Science of Cooking provides an engaging and relatable way to explore the science behind every meal.…

Side by side

How to EatThe Science of CookingEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

Scores by source

How to EatThe Science of Cooking
Goodreads 4.2 (7412) —
Hardcover 4.0 (6) —
Google Books 1.0 (1) —
Check price →Check price →

Reception

How to EatThe Science of Cooking
Ratings 7412 —
Editions 15 7
Want to read 9681 —
Reading it now 318 —
Written reviews 172 —
Wikipedia attention 294 —
Pages 537 544
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is shorter to read: How to Eat or The Science of Cooking?

How to Eat is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: How to Eat (537 pages, ≈ 9 h 57 m); The Science of Cooking (544 pages, ≈ 10 h 04 m).

Which is harder to read: How to Eat or The Science of Cooking?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — How to Eat: Moderate; The Science of Cooking: Moderate.

Shared themes