Foods vs The Science of Cooking: Which Should You Read?

Cover of Foods Foods Margaret McWilliams · 1989 ★★★★☆ 3.8 590 pages · ≈ 10 h 56 m · Moderate
More

Food and photography describe the reasons this professor of food science journeyed around the world with camera and pen in hand. Come along on her flavorful adventures.

1★2★3★4★5★
vs
Cover of The Science of Cooking The Science of Cooking Joseph J. Provost · 2016 544 pages · ≈ 10 h 04 m · Moderate
More

PROVIDES A CLEAR AND ACCESSIBLE PATH TO LEARNING KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS THROUGH THE LENS OF FOOD AND COOKINGThe Science of Cooking provides an engaging and relatable way to explore the science behind every meal.…

Side by side

FoodsThe Science of CookingEnjoymentDifficultyInfluencePopularityClassic

The verdict

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission on purchases.

Scores by source

FoodsThe Science of Cooking
Goodreads 3.8 (17) —
Check price →Check price →

Reception

FoodsThe Science of Cooking
Ratings 17 —
Editions 15 7
Film adaptations 1 —
Want to read 39 —
Reading it now 3 —
Written reviews 2 —
Wikipedia attention 33811 —
Pages 590 544
Check price →Check price →

Questions readers ask

Which is shorter to read: Foods or The Science of Cooking?

The Science of Cooking is the quickest read. Estimated at 225 words per minute: The Science of Cooking (544 pages, ≈ 10 h 04 m); Foods (590 pages, ≈ 10 h 56 m).

Which is harder to read: Foods or The Science of Cooking?

Estimated difficulty, based on era, reader shelves and length — Foods: Moderate; The Science of Cooking: Moderate.

Shared themes